![]() ![]() When getting started there are of course, 2 crucial determinations to make. You can usually build an equivalent machine cheaper than you can from a website, and the options are limitless since you can choose ANYTHING you want to go into it. The final point, is that big packagers make a KILLING on high end machines. When you build a machine yourself it only has what YOU intentionally put on it – Nothing else! Believe me, this is a wonderful thing. Some of these programs, and there may be as many as10 running simultaneously, can seriously slow down what is supposed to be a new, fast PC. The other problem is the software side of things… Not only do you not get an actual copy of the operating system installed on your machine, you get a menagerie of unwanted crap programs (called “bloatware” by many). ![]() You don’t get any of this buying a machine from Dell or HP. Most decent motherboards come with a 3 year warranty, good power supplies come with a 3 year warranty, some higher end video cards come with a LIFETIME warranty. You want more coverage than that? Well, you're going to have to pay for it! Unbeknown to most casual buyers, many internal components carry a far longer warranty than this. Usually these machines have a very weak power supply, a bargain basement motherboard (something they got a deal on 10,000 of), and of course, the warranty is what really bothers me. In doing that there are obviously some sacrifices that are made. PC's from big packagers (Dell, HP etc.) are built for one purpose: To make the largest amount of money possible. Thank you and I hope this helps somebody! If you have anything that you think needs to be added, amended, or corrected, please PM Esconder () or myself and we will do what we can to get it resolved. This thread will be a long work in progress, so please be patient as new sections (Motherboards, RAM, Video cards, Hard Drives etc.) are added. The thought occurred to me that if we had a general PC builders thread, it might be a good resource for those considering building a system. My current machine is the culmination of countless hours of review reading, electronics site browsing etc. It was a glitchy mess most of the time, but most computers were back then anyway (and I endured windows ME for much longer than I should have, but let's not talk about that). ![]() My 1st machine, built in 2000 with the help of a friend, ran for 7 years. The program is not worth the disk space it occupies.We occasionally get questions on here about PC component selection for Graphics Cards, CPU's Etc. While disk performance is certainly important, depending on the tasks you typically perform, disk performance may negligibly impact the performance of those tasks - especially if you have gobs of RAM installed. If you look at all of the scores in the screen shots above they all (except the OPs) show disk performance is the determining factor for the Base score. Many thought there was something wrong with their systems when in reality, nothing changed. Users complained because they did not understand why their scores dropped. For example, when SSDs became commonplace, it was common for users disk scores, and often over all Base scores to drop. This is why, as new technologies were adapted, the scoring changed as well. It was intended for users to compare before and after performance on the same computer - before and after hardware changes. ![]() It caused much more confusion than its worth, and was never intended to be a benchmark to compare with other systems anyway. Click to expand.It is, and even MS understood that which is why they removed the GUI and easy access to it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |